Pirates Move Towards UAE
The percentage of merchant ships hijacked while travelling to or from ports within the Arabian Gulf rose from 33 per cent in 2010 to 40 per cent last year. Of the seven merchant vessels currently held, four were transiting to or from ports within the Arabian Gulf.
Somali pirates move towards the UAE in hunt for easier prey
By Ruari Dowds and Tim Hart
In recent years, Somali piracy has moved from isolated incidents to become the main talking point in the shipping industry. The pirates have constantly been evolving their strategy and reacting to the developing security measures being brought against them.
In the last two weeks, two UAE-owned vessels have been hijacked while trading with Somalia. This is just a small indication of how the Arabian Gulf has been and continues to be affected by the phenomenon.
Piracy is in no way limited to the shores of Somalia and the Indian Ocean. Piracy and armed robbery at sea is a global phenomenon. Hijacking vessels is not a unique tactic of Somali gangs; West African pirates target small tankers to offload their cargo and occasionally members of the crew. Some South-East Asian criminal gangs target barge-towing tugs for their value on the international market. But Somali piracy has seen the highest-profile hijacking for ransom model, which last year generated nearly $200 million (Dh735 million) in payments.
The Middle East has always been affected by the growth of these hijacking groups; however, piracy has gradually targeted vessels on more and more trading routes, so that any vessel leaving the Arabian Gulf is now threatened by Somali gangs.
Piracy is, of course, motivated by profit and financial gain. In a disturbing development for the Middle East, last year saw a more focused approach by pirates on the Arabian Sea. The expanse of ocean east of the Gulf of Aden has the highest concentration of shipping routes in the region, and pirates have begun converging on this area to improve their chances of hijacking ships for ransom.
There is the additional bonus that over a dozen oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz every day and successfully seizing just one of these vessels could provide a ransom of over $10 million. Some groups have changed their operating area to hunt the waters south of the Gulf of Aden. The majority of vessels hijacked last year and all the vessels hijacked so far this year have been in this area.
In March 2011, the vessel Sinar Kudus was hijacked in the southern Arabian Sea. Within a very short space of time, reports indicated that dozens of pirates had joined the vessel, which transported them north along the Omani coast and into the Gulf of Oman, which leads to the Strait of Hormuz. So far this year, while attack numbers have fallen, the groups have continued to push further north.
This shift in focus is demonstrated by the planned routes of hijacked vessels. Not counting fishing boats or local dhows, the percentage of merchant ships that were hijacked while travelling to or from ports within the Arabian Gulf rose from 33 per cent in 2010 to 40 per cent last year. Of the seven merchant vessels currently held, four were transiting to or from ports within the Arabian Gulf.
This spread of pirate activity is a result of never-ending adaptation to evolving security measures. Their diminished success rate is because of several factors: gangs have struggled through unusually bad weather for months, and are also encountering increasingly effective naval strategy and ship-security measures, most notably the increased deployment of armed guards on-board vulnerable vessels. This has pushed pirates to different areas of operation of which the area of greatest concern is the Gulf of Oman.
Also of concern is the vulnerability of anchorages in the region, most notably that of Fujairah, where about 600 vessels use the port each month. In August, the chemical tanker Fairchem Bogey was hijacked from the anchorage at Salalah in an ambitious operation. To date, this has been the only such incident, but if the prevalence of armed guards continues to neutralise pirate operations, the congested anchorage of Fujairah may present a tempting target. This type of hijacking is eminently achievable, as pirates’ repeated successes off the coast of Benin last year and Lagos this year have demonstrated. So far this year, two attacks have occurred just 100 kilometres east of Fujairah.
The majority of the shipping industry and media focus is on merchant ships trading internationally. But the local dhow and fishing trades often get forgotten. Dhows are frequently targeted, not simply for their monetary value but to be adapted as mother-ships. This adds an additional, terrifying risk to those on-board, who may be forced to launch attacks to capture larger vessels.
This brings dhows into contact with increasingly aggressive naval forces, which have been hesitant to stop some of the larger mother-ships fearing the risk to hostages. Naval forces have been more active against the more commonly used hijacked dhows.
Additionally, Iran has been active against piracy in recent months as part of a demonstration of military strength aimed at the West and Israel. Given that the US navy is also extensively involved in counter-piracy operations in the area, this brings two antagonistic naval forces together in a limited theatre fraught with international tensions.
These factors make the commercial operations of dhows in the region extremely dangerous. The Italian navy’s recent killing of two Indian fishermen, after they were mistakenly identified as pirates, highlights the risks being run by smaller trading vessels.
With sanctions on Iran restricting local trade even further, and now impending sanctions against Somalia’s Al Shabaab-controlled charcoal trade, the strain on both local and international shipping for the Middle East is not likely to ease anytime soon. As better conditions have returned to the area where pirates have had the most recent success, they will continue to put themselves in the most advantageous position to hijack vessels.
Source: The National
Tim Hart and Ruari Dowds are security analysts with Maritime and Underwater Security Consultants based in London
Access MUSC website here: http://www.mandusc.com/
One Reply to “Pirates Move Towards UAE”
If a swarm of bees or hornets continue to sting our children, we find the hive and wipe it out. We have no problem with this, even though most of the bees and hornets in the nest do not sting our children. If we “did” have a problem with this, we would continue to treat the symptom and not the problem.
Because we view pirate communities as “innocent civilians”, we try to defend ourselves against swarms of pirates operating away from their hive. However, if we understood that these communities are actually support systems for piracy, we might be better able to understand that their existence is the reason the pirates continue to operate.
There are therefore two options to address the problem instead of the symptom: 1) locate and destroy the pirate communities, taking as much care as possible to rescue current hostages and treat every inhabitant as an enemy combatant, or 2) co-op the community into either patrolling the seas in “defense” of shipping against other pirates (pay them an honest wage) or help them to establish a self-supporting economy that does not need to resort to piracy.
The first option might seem severe, but it has the added benefit of telling other pirate communities that their “loved ones” are no longer safe from retribution for supporting their lifestyle. The second option shows compassion for their situation, but unfortunately rewards violent agression and sends a message that if you want help, all you have to do is threaten the safety of others (just like North Korea).
Regardless of which option we might choose, attempts to treat the symptom will only result in escalation and dispersion, making it more difficult and costly to prevent future attacks. Taking one of the two paths/options provided above will at least remove the threat, cost less, and end the fear of being stung.